Genetic Expression in Clones Differs from That in Donor Animals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A donor animal and its clone are not genetically identical, and in fact, the clones sometimes exhibit dangerously different patterns of gene expression. So says a team of researchers from the Whitehead Institute at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Hawaii in today's issue of the journal Science. Their findings, which are based on a group of mice they cloned from embryonic stem cells, confirm the fear that reproductive cloning could prove unsafe.

The scientists first cloned the animals by way of nuclear transfer, removing the genetic material from embryonic stem cells and placing it inside emptied egg cells for development. Then they monitored the activity of so-called imprinted genes. Unlike other developmental genes, these genes are controlled by special tags. They hoped to discover why animals cloned from embryonic stem cells have such a poor survival rate and why some are much bigger at birth than their natural counterparts.

The team found that the tags that switch imprinted genes on or off were not faithfully reproduced from donor cell to clone¿and the problem lay not in the cloning procedure but with the embryonic stem cells. As these cells divided in culture, they lost tags to such a degree that even sister cells gave rise to clones with dramatically different patterns of gene expression. Despite this instability, many embryos survived to adulthood. "This suggests that even apparently normal clones may have subtle aberrations of gene expression that are not easily detected in the cloned animal," M.I.T.'s Rudolf Jaenisch remarks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Confirming that nuclear transfer was not to blame, the researchers showed that clones derived by a different technique¿namely directly from embryonic stem cells¿exhibited the same irregular gene expression. "It is important to remember that embryonic stem cells when combined with normal cells as in making chimeras or when used in transplantation may function fine," Jaenisch concludes. "In other words, ES cells might work fine when used as cell therapy, but when they are used to make whole animals would likely produce organisms that are abnormal."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe