New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Genetic Expression in Clones Differs from That in Donor Animals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A donor animal and its clone are not genetically identical, and in fact, the clones sometimes exhibit dangerously different patterns of gene expression. So says a team of researchers from the Whitehead Institute at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Hawaii in today's issue of the journal Science. Their findings, which are based on a group of mice they cloned from embryonic stem cells, confirm the fear that reproductive cloning could prove unsafe.

The scientists first cloned the animals by way of nuclear transfer, removing the genetic material from embryonic stem cells and placing it inside emptied egg cells for development. Then they monitored the activity of so-called imprinted genes. Unlike other developmental genes, these genes are controlled by special tags. They hoped to discover why animals cloned from embryonic stem cells have such a poor survival rate and why some are much bigger at birth than their natural counterparts.

The team found that the tags that switch imprinted genes on or off were not faithfully reproduced from donor cell to clone¿and the problem lay not in the cloning procedure but with the embryonic stem cells. As these cells divided in culture, they lost tags to such a degree that even sister cells gave rise to clones with dramatically different patterns of gene expression. Despite this instability, many embryos survived to adulthood. "This suggests that even apparently normal clones may have subtle aberrations of gene expression that are not easily detected in the cloned animal," M.I.T.'s Rudolf Jaenisch remarks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Confirming that nuclear transfer was not to blame, the researchers showed that clones derived by a different technique¿namely directly from embryonic stem cells¿exhibited the same irregular gene expression. "It is important to remember that embryonic stem cells when combined with normal cells as in making chimeras or when used in transplantation may function fine," Jaenisch concludes. "In other words, ES cells might work fine when used as cell therapy, but when they are used to make whole animals would likely produce organisms that are abnormal."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe