Genetic Privacy: Should Family Members Be Warned?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sarah, a 40-year-old mother of three, has found out from various tests that she has an elevated risk of Alzheimer’s disease, as well as of breast cancer. Does she have a legal or moral obligation to tell her children or close relatives that they, too, might be at high risk of getting these illnesses in the future?

The legal issue is straightforward: no court has held an individual liable for failing to warn a relative about genetic test results. The moral issue depends on many factors, including the severity of a genetic condition, the number of years before it is likely to produce symptoms, and whether the condition is treatable. The nature of relationships (parent and child) and their emotional closeness matter, too, as do relatives’ ages, their interest in knowing about the chance of future ills, and the individual’s own concern about not divulging his or her personal problems.

The nature of the danger often plays a strong role. In rare cases, genetic conditions can be lethal if combined with environmental stressors. For example, individuals with the genetic mutation for malignant hyperthermia can die during surgery if certain anesthesia is used. People with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy can suffer sudden death from strenuous exercise. The potential for these types of harm warrant notifying at-risk relatives.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Yet sharing one’s genetic information with family members can be perilous. Testing may reveal, for instance, that the man everyone thought was a child’s father actually is not, sending a family into turmoil. Genetic counselors can help people decide whether to undergo genetic testing and how to respond to possible results, but currently only 2,500 counselors practice in the U.S. The most common mistake is getting tested and waiting for results before considering what to do. Anyone contemplating testing should determine in advance whether to share the results with close relatives. There is no simple answer. The best advice is to consult with professionals and think ahead about the possible consequences.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe