New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Genetic Secrets of Man's Best Friend Revealed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have decoded the dog genome. A boxer named Tasha, selected for her high degree of inbreeding, has had her genetic secrets puzzled out and then compared to partial genetic pictures of other breeds of dog and other mammals. It has been a long wait for humanity's first companion, domesticated from gray wolves at least 15,000 years ago.

Researchers first broke up Tasha's genome into small sections of genetic material, deciphered the makeup of each of those bits, and then pieced them together into a complete genetic map--the so-called whole genome shotgun strategy. Tasha's high degree of inbreeding simplified the task of decoding her 2.4-billion-letter genetic code by reducing the differences between her 39 chromosome pairs. The fact that she is a female, however, left the team without a picture of the canine Y chromosome.

The dog apparently shares 94 percent of its genetic sequence with humans and mice, despite having a substantially smaller genome thanks to fewer repeat sequences. And dog lovers will be happy to know that humans have more in common genetically with dogs than with mice, despite sharing a more recent common ancestor with the latter.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By comparing Tasha's DNA to that of nine other dog breeds, coyotes and four types of wolves, the researchers also found that all modern breeds--from poodles to malamutes--derive from at least two population bottlenecks: one that occurred thousands of years ago when humans bred dogs from wolves and one that happened in the last few hundred years as humans bred that ancestral population into the dogs of all shapes and sizes observable today.

Because each breed represents an isolated group with discrete traits that can be linked to distinct genes--and because different breeds suffer from some of the same maladies that afflict humans, such as allergies or certain types of cancer--the dog's genome should help isolate the genetic roots of such diseases, proving dogs' utility to humanity once more. "For millennia, dogs have accompanied humans on their travels," the researchers write in the paper presenting the findings in the current issue of Nature. "It is only fitting that the dog should also be a valued companion on our journeys of scientific discovery."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe