Genetic Study Reveals Similarities between Diverse Populations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though they may speak different languages and eat distinct foods, people from far-flung geographical locations are genetically very similar, researchers say. A report published today in the journal Science suggests that 93 to 95 percent of human genetic variation exists among individuals within populations, while differences among major groups make up less than 5 percent of the variation. But the findings also reveal that even these tiny differences alone can provide enough information to group people by population.

Marcus W. Feldman of Stanford University and his colleagues analyzed samples from 1,056 people belonging to 52 populations. Specifically, they looked at 377 so-called microsatellites, short segments of DNA that occur in specific patterns. "Each microsatellite had between four and 32 distinct types," Feldman says. "Most were found in people from several continents, suggesting that only a tiny fraction of genetic traits are distinctive to specific populations. This means that visible differences between human groups--such as skin color and skull shape--result from differences in a very small proportion of genetic traits."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe