New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Genetically Engineered 'Mighty Mice' May Shed Light on Muscle-Wasting Diseases

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Photo: KEITH WELLER/Johns Hopkins Medical

Four years ago, a group of Johns Hopkins researchers created a line of genetically engineered "mighty mice" by removing a growth-regulating gene. Now they have engineered another batch of overly muscular rodents. The first set of mice (see image) lacked the myostatin gene from their genetic codes. But in the new research, published in the July 17th issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the pumped-up mice retained their myostatin. Instead the scientists altered the animals' physiques by tweaking three proteins capable of blocking myostatin's activity to varying degrees.

Myostatin acts as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass. If it is unable to function, muscles can grow uninhibited. Mice engineered to produce excess amounts of the protein follistatin had the most powerful muscles: one such mouse exhibited average muscle weights 261 percent greater than control animals. Mice with excess mutant activin II receptors and those with myostatin propeptide also showed increased muscle mass compared with their ordinary mousy counterparts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"By expressing high levels of these proteins in mice, we have been able to increase muscle mass to levels comparable to those seen in mice completely lacking myostatin," Se-Jin Lee, the study¿s lead author, says.

Because the function of myostatin appears to be conserved across species, the researchers are hopeful that the findings will be beneficial in shaping treatments for muscle-wasting diseases. Lee cautions, however, that more testing is necessary to determine whether administering the proteins directly, instead of altering the genome, can provide similar results. "The agricultural implications are probably more straight forward, since conceivably, one could try to find ways to block myostatin activity early during development," he says. "For human applications, this research is just the beginning."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe