Genetically Engineered 'Mighty Mice' May Shed Light on Muscle-Wasting Diseases

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Photo: KEITH WELLER/Johns Hopkins Medical

Four years ago, a group of Johns Hopkins researchers created a line of genetically engineered "mighty mice" by removing a growth-regulating gene. Now they have engineered another batch of overly muscular rodents. The first set of mice (see image) lacked the myostatin gene from their genetic codes. But in the new research, published in the July 17th issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the pumped-up mice retained their myostatin. Instead the scientists altered the animals' physiques by tweaking three proteins capable of blocking myostatin's activity to varying degrees.

Myostatin acts as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass. If it is unable to function, muscles can grow uninhibited. Mice engineered to produce excess amounts of the protein follistatin had the most powerful muscles: one such mouse exhibited average muscle weights 261 percent greater than control animals. Mice with excess mutant activin II receptors and those with myostatin propeptide also showed increased muscle mass compared with their ordinary mousy counterparts.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"By expressing high levels of these proteins in mice, we have been able to increase muscle mass to levels comparable to those seen in mice completely lacking myostatin," Se-Jin Lee, the study¿s lead author, says.

Because the function of myostatin appears to be conserved across species, the researchers are hopeful that the findings will be beneficial in shaping treatments for muscle-wasting diseases. Lee cautions, however, that more testing is necessary to determine whether administering the proteins directly, instead of altering the genome, can provide similar results. "The agricultural implications are probably more straight forward, since conceivably, one could try to find ways to block myostatin activity early during development," he says. "For human applications, this research is just the beginning."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe