New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Geneticists Say Africa's Elephants Belong to Two Species, Not One

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Biologists have long recognized morphological differences between Africa's forest-dwelling elephants and those that inhabit the savanna. But they have always considered the two types to be members of the same threatened species. The results of a genetic study described today in the journal Science, however, indicate that the elephants form distinct groups and thus merit recognition as separate species. The new findings could impact Africa¿s elephant conservation efforts.

Stephen J. O¿Brien of the National Cancer Institute and his colleagues analyzed DNA obtained from 195 free-ranging elephants from across Africa, as well as DNA from seven Asian elephants (which were already considered a separate species). Focusing on sequences from four nuclear genes, the team found differences between forest and savanna elephants amounting to more than half that seen between African and Asian elephants. They also detected very little evidence of interbreeding between the two African types. On that basis, the researchers propose reassigning the forest elephants from the species Loxodonta africana to Loxodonta cyclotis.

Distinguishing the forest and savanna elephants in this way could have important implications for conservation management of the two groups. Forest elephants, which are concentrated in politically unstable countries, face particularly intense pressure from human activities. "Given the rapid depletion of both forest and savanna elephant numbers in the past century and the ongoing destruction of their habitats, the conservation implications of recognition and species-level management of these distinct taxa are considerable," the authors write

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe