Geneticists Say Africa's Elephants Belong to Two Species, Not One

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Biologists have long recognized morphological differences between Africa's forest-dwelling elephants and those that inhabit the savanna. But they have always considered the two types to be members of the same threatened species. The results of a genetic study described today in the journal Science, however, indicate that the elephants form distinct groups and thus merit recognition as separate species. The new findings could impact Africa¿s elephant conservation efforts.

Stephen J. O¿Brien of the National Cancer Institute and his colleagues analyzed DNA obtained from 195 free-ranging elephants from across Africa, as well as DNA from seven Asian elephants (which were already considered a separate species). Focusing on sequences from four nuclear genes, the team found differences between forest and savanna elephants amounting to more than half that seen between African and Asian elephants. They also detected very little evidence of interbreeding between the two African types. On that basis, the researchers propose reassigning the forest elephants from the species Loxodonta africana to Loxodonta cyclotis.

Distinguishing the forest and savanna elephants in this way could have important implications for conservation management of the two groups. Forest elephants, which are concentrated in politically unstable countries, face particularly intense pressure from human activities. "Given the rapid depletion of both forest and savanna elephant numbers in the past century and the ongoing destruction of their habitats, the conservation implications of recognition and species-level management of these distinct taxa are considerable," the authors write

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe