New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Geologists Solve Mystery of Nepal's “Earthquake Gap”

One of Nepal’s major faults appeared worrisomely silent—but new evidence suggests otherwise

Aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquake in Sankhu.

Turjoy Chowdhury Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Like a slow-motion car crash, the Indian subcontinent is colliding with Eurasia. This impact, along a fault known as the Main Himalayan Thrust, is the force driving the rise of the Himalayas. In April 2015 it triggered Nepal’s magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, which destroyed villages and parts of Kathmandu, killing thousands.

Nepal is no stranger to such temblors—but in the western part of the country, no significant earthquakes have been recorded since 1505. Such a “seismic gap” could be bad news: if the region’s faults are not releasing their pent-up stress every so often, one or more very large and potentially catastrophic earthquakes could result. “With more than 500 years of waiting, the stored energy due to the convergence of India [and Eurasia] could be considerable,” says Zakaria Ghazoui, a geologist at the Institute of Earth Sciences in Grenoble, France. The sudden release of this energy could devastate nearby places such as Pokhara, one of Nepal’s largest cities.

Credit: Mapping Specialists; Source: “Bimodal Seismicity in the Himalaya Controlled by Fault Friction and Geometry,” by Luca Dal Zilio et al., in Nature Communications, Vol. 10, No. 48; January 3, 2019


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To determine whether this seismic gap actually exists, Ghazoui and a team of researchers ventured onto Rara Lake in western Nepal’s Himalayas and retrieved cores of sedimentary layers from the bottom. They suspected the cores might contain records of when any past earthquakes occurred because quakes can cause underwater avalanches that leave behind layers of what Ghazoui calls “disorganized” sediment.

The team found evidence of at least eight avalanches since 1505, corresponding to moderate to large quakes. “We were hoping to find the trace of the 1505 earthquake, but the discovery of the other earthquake-triggered avalanches was a real surprise,” he says. This means that the area’s faults may not be storing as much stress as has been thought. But it also highlights the “almost permanent risk” that the area faces when it comes to earthquake hazards in general, explains Ghazoui, who led the new research, which was published in May in Nature Communications.*

This is the first time that researchers have used lake sediment records to peer into the Himalayas’ earthquake history, according to Roger Bilham, a seismologist at the University of Colorado Boulder, who was not involved in the research—which, he says, “is just a teaser of what can be done.”

*Editor's Note (5/22/19): This story has been updated to include the month of the study’s publication and the journal it appeared in.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe