Geologists Solve Mystery of Nepal's “Earthquake Gap”

One of Nepal’s major faults appeared worrisomely silent—but new evidence suggests otherwise

Aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquake in Sankhu.

Turjoy Chowdhury Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Like a slow-motion car crash, the Indian subcontinent is colliding with Eurasia. This impact, along a fault known as the Main Himalayan Thrust, is the force driving the rise of the Himalayas. In April 2015 it triggered Nepal’s magnitude 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, which destroyed villages and parts of Kathmandu, killing thousands.

Nepal is no stranger to such temblors—but in the western part of the country, no significant earthquakes have been recorded since 1505. Such a “seismic gap” could be bad news: if the region’s faults are not releasing their pent-up stress every so often, one or more very large and potentially catastrophic earthquakes could result. “With more than 500 years of waiting, the stored energy due to the convergence of India [and Eurasia] could be considerable,” says Zakaria Ghazoui, a geologist at the Institute of Earth Sciences in Grenoble, France. The sudden release of this energy could devastate nearby places such as Pokhara, one of Nepal’s largest cities.

Credit: Mapping Specialists; Source: “Bimodal Seismicity in the Himalaya Controlled by Fault Friction and Geometry,” by Luca Dal Zilio et al., in Nature Communications, Vol. 10, No. 48; January 3, 2019


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To determine whether this seismic gap actually exists, Ghazoui and a team of researchers ventured onto Rara Lake in western Nepal’s Himalayas and retrieved cores of sedimentary layers from the bottom. They suspected the cores might contain records of when any past earthquakes occurred because quakes can cause underwater avalanches that leave behind layers of what Ghazoui calls “disorganized” sediment.

The team found evidence of at least eight avalanches since 1505, corresponding to moderate to large quakes. “We were hoping to find the trace of the 1505 earthquake, but the discovery of the other earthquake-triggered avalanches was a real surprise,” he says. This means that the area’s faults may not be storing as much stress as has been thought. But it also highlights the “almost permanent risk” that the area faces when it comes to earthquake hazards in general, explains Ghazoui, who led the new research, which was published in May in Nature Communications.*

This is the first time that researchers have used lake sediment records to peer into the Himalayas’ earthquake history, according to Roger Bilham, a seismologist at the University of Colorado Boulder, who was not involved in the research—which, he says, “is just a teaser of what can be done.”

*Editor's Note (5/22/19): This story has been updated to include the month of the study’s publication and the journal it appeared in.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe