Getting the Big Picture: BMC Ecology Image Competition Winners [Slide Show]

With the snap of a camera or the click of a mouse, participants in this year's BioMed Central image contest provided a peek into the intricate relationships uniting members of our biosphere

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Bright green doesn’t seem like the best choice for camouflage. But the image of a vibrant green stick insect, Timema poppensis, perched almost invisibly atop the matching leaves of its host, a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), provides visual support to the idea that color is a key part of coevolution, an ecological process in which two or more species develop together.

This image, which is the winner of the open-access publisher BioMed Central’s Ecology Image Competition 2012, was picked in large part because of its ability to illustrate this natural process. “Many of the images submitted were visually stunning,” said Yan Wong, a member of the editorial board who helped select among the entries in photography or data visualization from people at research institutions across the globe, in a press release. “This wasn't simply a search for an amazing picture, however. Just as important were the ecological processes depicted. Ideally, images should immediately hint at one or more ecological processes,” Wong said.

Moritz Muschick’s photograph of T. poppensis and S. sempervirens did just that. This vibrant green insect is one example of a species that, over time, adapted to live on very different host plants at a variety of elevations. Today scientists look at Timema’s DNA to study how different forms of coloring or camouflage affect speciation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


View the BioMed Central Ecology Image Competition 2012 slide show

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe