Getting from Here to There

A protein borrowed from the rabies virus gets a drug to where it is needed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As hard as it is for scientists to develop new drugs, sometimes just getting the drug to where it needs to act is equally challenging. Nowhere is this more true than in the brain, where blood vessel walls are tightly knit, keeping most large molecules from seeping out of the bloodstream and into brain tissue. This blood-brain barrier is a formidable obstacle to delivering certain types of treatments for neurological diseases, but Manjunath N. Swamy and his team at Harvard Medical School's Immune Disease Institute devised a clever way to sneak a drug through and insert it directly into brain cells.

Some viruses that specialize in infecting the nervous system, such as rabies and herpes, are adept at penetrating the blood-brain barrier. Swamy's group exploited that capability by disguising a drug with a small protein normally found on the surface of the rabies virus. The protein is believed to unlock a passageway through the blood vessel walls, and a drug molecule hitched to the viral protein was able to penetrate the barrier. Once inside the brain, the protein also allowed the drug to enter individual nerve cells, much as a virus would infect them. The therapeutic molecule used in Swamy's experiments was a small nucleic acid chain, known as a short-interfering RNA (siRNA), which can be customized to target specific genes and suppress their effects, making siRNA delivered straight to the brain a versatile tool for a wide range of uses.

The same can be said of another tiny Trojan horse built by Hans Boumans and his colleagues at the Netherlands Organization for Applied Research. The team's “BioSwitch” consists of a biopolymer cage that can protect or conceal a variety of substances until their release is desirable. Both the cage material and the trigger to discharge its contents can be tailored to specific situations.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For instance, Boumans's group created a germ-killing plastic wrap for meat by encapsulating a bactericidal enzyme inside woven cages of cross-linked starch molecules, then coating the plastic with them. The starch cages remain inert unless bacteria are present and start eating the starch, thus degrading the cage until—surprise—the killer enzyme is released. A similar system could allow unstable food-flavoring molecules to remain encased until they contact enzymes on the tongue or foul-tasting nutrients to stay sealed in their cages until they reach digestive enzymes in the gut.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe