Giant Crack Found in Antarctic Ice

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: NASA GSFC

Using satellite images, scientists have now given Antarctica its second annual physical examination, and they have found a giant crack in a glacier that may produce a major iceberg in less than 18 months (bottom right image).

The researchers from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and NASA discovered the 25-kilometer-long crack¿spanning more than two thirds of the glacier¿using NASA's Landsat 7 satellite, which passes over the continent 16 times a day on its nearly pole-to-pole orbit. The satellite takes about 300 pictures of the continent during the Antarctic summer (November through February). On the last picture of the site, taken 10 months ago, there was no crack in the ice shelf (top right image).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To determine how quickly the crack was growing, the scientists needed additional data, which they obtained by combining their findings with earlier observations from NASA's Terra satellite, the Canadian Space Agency's RADARSAT and the European Space Agency's Radar Imager. "Most of this crack formed very rapidly, in less than five weeks," says Robert Blindschadler, a glaciologist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. "Right now it is growing much more slowly, at about 13 meters a day."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe