Giant, Deadly Ice Slide Baffles Researchers

Climate change could be to blame for Tibetan tragedy

A glacier in Tibet.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

One of the world's largest documented ice avalanches is flummoxing researchers. But they suspect that glacier fluctuations caused by a changing climate—may be to blame.

About 100 million cubic metres of ice and rocks gushed down a narrow valley in Rutog county in the west of the Tibet Autonomous Region on July 17, killing nine herders and hundreds of sheep and yaks.

The debris covered nearly 10 square kilometres at a thickness of up to 30 metres, says Zong Jibiao, a glaciologist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (ITPR) in Beijing, who completed a field investigation of the site last week.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The only other known incident comparable in scale is the 2002 ice avalanche from the Kolka Glacier in the Caucasus Mountains in Russia, says Andreas Kääb, a glaciologist at the University of Oslo in Norway. That catastrophic event killed 140 people.

Preliminary analyses show that the Rutog avalanche was unusual because it started from a flat point at 5,200–6,200 metres above sea level rather than in steep terrain. The ice crashed down nearly one kilometre along the narrow gully and ran into the Aru Co lake, 6 kilometres away.

“The site of collapse is baffling … the Rutog avalanche initiated at quite a flat spot. It doesn’t make sense,” says Tian Lide, a glaciologist also at the ITPR, who runs a research station in Rutog.

Zong adds: “It went with such a force that the gully was widened out by the process."

Glacier surge

This force is likely to have been caused by lubrication of the ice from rain or glacial melt, and researchers think that increasing precipitation in recent years may be partly to blame.

Temperatures in Tibet have soared by 0.4 °C per decade since 1960—twice the global average. Warming can generate meltwater that carves out a glacier from within, making it vulnerable to collapse, says Tian.

Kääb thinks that both the Kolka and Rutog avalanches could have been triggered by a rare glacier surge, in which a glacier periodically advances 10–100 times faster than its normal speed. The phenomenon affects about 1% of glaciers globally.

Western Tibet has many surge-type glaciers, and some researchers suspect that climate change at high elevations could affect the frequency of surges.

Regardless of what triggered the Rutog avalanche, “climate change is causing more glacial hazards through mechanisms we don’t fully understand”, says Tian. “There is an urgent need for more monitoring and research efforts, especially in populated areas in high mountains.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on August 23, 2016.

Jane Qiu is an award-winning independent science writer in Beijing. She has won a Knight Science Journalism Fellowship, as well as awards from prestigious groups such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Association of British Science Writers.

More by Jane Qiu

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe