New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Giant Extinct Rodent Was Guinea Pig Relative

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sight of small rodents unnerves a lot of people. Now imagine one weighing upwards of 1,500 pounds and standing over four feet tall. That's the picture scientists are painting of Phoberomys pattersoni, judged to be the world's largest extinct rodent based on newly classified fossils. The ancient creature, described in a report published today in the journal Science, lived eight million years ago and is an extinct cousin of today's guinea pig.

Researchers led by Orangel Aguilera of Venezuela's Universidad Nacional Experimental Francisco de Miranda discovered a nearly complete fossil of P. pattersoni, dubbed Goya, in May of 2000. The remains were trapped within sedimentary layers of brown shales and coal in an area of northwestern Venezuela 250 miles west of Caracas known as the Urumaco Formation. Analysis of the skeleton led to estimates of its immense size: 4.2 feet tall and 9 feet long. "Imagine a weird guinea pig, but huge, with a long tail for balancing on its hind legs and continuously growing teeth," says study co-author Marcel R. Sánchez-Villagra of the University of Tübingen in Germany. "It was semi-aquatic, like the capybara [the largest living rodent] and probably foraged along a riverbank." R. McNeill Alexander of the University of Leeds observes in an accompanying commentary, that "seen from a distance, it would have looked much more like a buffalo than like a scaled-up guinea pig."

What caused the demise of P. pattersoni remains unknown. In comparison to the behemoth, today's rodent heavyweight, the capybara, is a slight 110 pounds. "The question that puzzles me is not how Phoberomys could have been so large, but why the overwhelming majority of rodents are so small," Alexander writes. P. pattersoni's girth would most likely have made burrowing--the common escape route for rodents--difficult, he notes, and perhaps large rodents were too slow to outrun their predators.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe