Giant Extinct Rodent Was Guinea Pig Relative

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sight of small rodents unnerves a lot of people. Now imagine one weighing upwards of 1,500 pounds and standing over four feet tall. That's the picture scientists are painting of Phoberomys pattersoni, judged to be the world's largest extinct rodent based on newly classified fossils. The ancient creature, described in a report published today in the journal Science, lived eight million years ago and is an extinct cousin of today's guinea pig.

Researchers led by Orangel Aguilera of Venezuela's Universidad Nacional Experimental Francisco de Miranda discovered a nearly complete fossil of P. pattersoni, dubbed Goya, in May of 2000. The remains were trapped within sedimentary layers of brown shales and coal in an area of northwestern Venezuela 250 miles west of Caracas known as the Urumaco Formation. Analysis of the skeleton led to estimates of its immense size: 4.2 feet tall and 9 feet long. "Imagine a weird guinea pig, but huge, with a long tail for balancing on its hind legs and continuously growing teeth," says study co-author Marcel R. Sánchez-Villagra of the University of Tübingen in Germany. "It was semi-aquatic, like the capybara [the largest living rodent] and probably foraged along a riverbank." R. McNeill Alexander of the University of Leeds observes in an accompanying commentary, that "seen from a distance, it would have looked much more like a buffalo than like a scaled-up guinea pig."

What caused the demise of P. pattersoni remains unknown. In comparison to the behemoth, today's rodent heavyweight, the capybara, is a slight 110 pounds. "The question that puzzles me is not how Phoberomys could have been so large, but why the overwhelming majority of rodents are so small," Alexander writes. P. pattersoni's girth would most likely have made burrowing--the common escape route for rodents--difficult, he notes, and perhaps large rodents were too slow to outrun their predators.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe