Giant Sperm Found in Crustacean Fossils

The "gargantuan gametes" are the oldest on record and have visible nuclei

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A set of tiny ancient crustaceans has yielded the oldest — and some of the biggest — fossilized sperm cells ever discovered. The specimens, which are at least 16 million years old, were preserved well enough to show some of the structures within the creatures' unusually large gametes, which researchers were able to reconstruct in three dimensions from X-ray data.

Ostracods are a class of crustacean still around today. They are shrimp-like animals typically around 1 millimeter in length, but their sperm cells are disproportionately long — up to 1 centimeter. Renate Matzke-Karasz, a self-described ostrocodologist at Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich, used synchrotron X-rays to reveal the soft tissue inside fossils of freshwater ostracods found in an Australian cave.

Many of the fossilized sperm cells were tangled together, and their lengths were difficult to determine precisely. But the researchers estimate them to be around 1.2 mm long — around 20 times the length of a human sperm cell. The researchers report their results today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Soft tissue is normally obliterated by the process that turns flesh into rock, but the innards of these ostracods were preserved in excellent detail. By taking multiple X-ray images of the fossils and then stacking them to produce a three-dimensional image, the researchers were able to image some of the sperm cells down to their nuclei, as well as the reproductive systems and muscles of the ancient animals (see ‘Supersize sperm from the past’).

When we found the sperm inside it was really thrilling,” says Matzke-Karasz. “When we found the nuclei we were just flattened.” The results suggest that the X-ray imaging method could be used more widely in palaeontology, says Matzke-Karasz.

Researchers had previously described ostracod sperm from fossils found in Romania, but those dated back to less than 15,000 years ago. The fossils described in Matzke-Karasz’s paper are estimated to be between 16 million and 23 million years old. This, Matzke-Karasz says, proves that giant sperm have persisted in these animals for a substantial period of time.

Ostracods do not hold the record for largest sperm cells — that distinction belongs to some species of fruitfly, which have sperm up to several centimetres long. Exactly why ostracods have such elongated gametes is unclear, says Matzke-Karasz, and she is now working to gain a better understanding of reproduction in living ostracods to tease out an answer.

Scott Pitnick, who studies reproductive biology at Syracuse University in New York says that sperm evolves very quickly and is of great interest to evolutionary biologists. But although researchers can study sperm from thousands of extant species, they often can only infer what has happened in the past. “Seeing is believing,” he says of the latest paper. “For evolutionary biologists, there’s nothing like a good fossil to have it laid out in front of your eyes.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on May 14, 2014.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe