Glaciers “Sing” as They Crack at Night

Fracturing of Himalayan glaciers could make them melt faster, threatening the water supply for more than a billion people in Asia 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A spectacular view of Mount Everest was not what most stunned Hokkaido University geoscientist Evgeny A. Podolskiy during his first trip to the Himalayas in October 2017. What shocked him while working and living in the area were the loud, reverberating booms every night.

“The ice was cracking up,” says Podolskiy, who has done research in several other glacier environments around the world, including Greenland and the Alps. “I've never come across anything like this before.” Aside from one anecdotal observation made in the Arctic, there was no scientific record of such glacial fracturing at night.

The cracking is bad news for the more than a billion people in Asia who rely on these icy reservoirs for water. “This kind of wear and tear on a daily basis can make glaciers more fragile and therefore melt more easily,” meaning there will be less water available over time, Podolskiy says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To home in on the source of the cracking, Podolskiy and his colleagues installed seismometers throughout the Trakarding-Trambau Glacier System in eastern Nepal—the first such attempt in the Himalayas. The team noticed an interesting pattern: the seismic rumbles came from ice surfaces free of debris. And larger drops in nighttime air temperatures resulted in stronger seismic signals, the team reported last September in Geophysical Research Letters.

In contrast, ice blanketed with a layer of loose rocks made little noise, and it was totally silent if the rubble above the ice was thicker than two feet. “The debris, in effect, protects glaciers from temperature oscillations that make the ice expand and contract cyclically,” Podolskiy says. “When the temperature drops sharply, as it does at high elevations, the rapid contraction of unprotected ice breaks it up.”

That protection is limited, however, because less than one fifth of the glacier surface in the Himalayas is covered with debris.

Walter Immerzeel, a glacier hydrologist at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, who has worked in the Himalayas for more than 16 years and was not involved in the study, called the finding fascinating. The study “points to a new way that the stability of glaciers can be threatened,” Immerzeel says. Cracks not only cause mechanical damage; they also act as conduits for water and heat and can greatly accelerate ice loss, he adds.

As Podolskiy's team plans its future studies in the Himalayas, “a pressing issue is how cracks develop and evolve throughout the year and how this affects water flow within the ice,” he says. “This is crucial for a better understanding of the future of Asia's water tower in a world of changing climate.”

Jane Qiu is an award-winning independent science writer in Beijing. She has won a Knight Science Journalism Fellowship, as well as awards from prestigious groups such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Association of British Science Writers.

More by Jane Qiu
Scientific American Magazine Vol 320 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Icy Nocturnes” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 320 No. 1 (), p. 12
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0119-12

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe