Glia Cells Help Neurons Build Synapses

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some 90 percent of the cells in your noggin are not neurons but glia¿brain cells that until now were credited with the organ's most unglamorous work. Indeed, scientists guessed that glia served only as scaffolding for the more important neurons or that perhaps they collected garbage molecules from synapses, the channels over which neurons communicate. A paper in the January 26th issue of Science, however, reveals that glial cells called astrocytes actually control the number of synapses neurons can form with each other. So, far from playing a supporting role, glia may in fact actively participate in learning and memory.

Ben Barres and his colleagues at Stanford University expected more from glia starting in 1997, when they discovered that neurons grown with astrocytes in culture are 10 times more active than neurons grown alone. What they didn't know was whether the increased activity resulted from more synapses or increased efficiency at the synapses. This time they performed a number of tests on neurons called retinal ganglion cells, finding that they, too, were seven times more responsive to an array of stimuli when they were grown near glia. And by way of staining and imaging, they were also able to conclude that glia-exposed retinal ganglion cells featured seven times as many synapses.

"In summary, these results show that the total number of synapses on a neuron is not an intrinsic property of that neuron, but can be profoundly regulated by extrinsic signals," the authors write. "In the absence of glia, neurons in culture have only a limited ability to form synapses. Astrocytes greatly increase the number of structurally mature, functional synapses and are necessary to maintain synaptic stability."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe