Global Warming May Threaten Birds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: DONALD W. THOMAS

Global warming may have yet another negative side effect: it could disrupt birds' breeding patterns and subsequently reduce their numbers considerably, according to a new study published in today's Science.

The rise in global temperature is likely to change the normal turn of seasons such that spring will arrive earlier. Although this may seem appealing at first, an earlier spring might come without the familiar chirping of birds. Indeed, the warmer weather could lead some birds to breed earlier in the year when food is not as readily available. Fewer birds would breed and fewer would survive.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To test this hypothesis, a team of scientists from Canada, France and the U.K. took a closer look at two populations of tiny blue tits called Parus caeruleus (see image) in southern France and on the island of Corsica. They discovered that whereas the birds on Corsica bred at the time when caterpillars¿a ready food source¿were most plentiful, the birds on the mainland were out of sync. They bred several weeks before the caterpillar population reached its peak. This relative food shortage made it more difficult for the mainland blue tits to rear their young and thus reduced the number of breeding adults overall.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe