Global Weather Disasters Cost $101 Billion in 2021

Hurricane Ida and flooding in Europe topped the list of costliest disasters

A car is seen under rubble after a building was destroyed by Hurricane Ida on August 30, 2021 in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For only the third time since 1970, insured losses from extreme weather events worldwide exceeded $100 billion, according to a report yesterday by Swiss Re, the global reinsurance company.

Insured losses this year from storms, floods and other dangerous events are projected to reach $101 billion, with the damage occurring overwhelmingly in the U.S., Swiss Re said.

The report is preliminary and does not include last weekend’s tornadoes in Kentucky and surrounding states, which caused an estimated $3 billion in damage.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The world’s costliest weather-related disaster this year was Hurricane Ida, a Category 4 storm that cut a path of devastation from Louisiana to New York in late August and early September and caused an estimated $30 billion to $32 billion in insured damages, according to Swiss Re.

The second-costliest event was the winter storm that knocked out power for millions of people in Texas in February and caused $15 billion in insured losses, Swiss Re said.

Outside the U.S., the costliest weather event was the flooding in July that swamped Germany and Belgium and caused $13 billion in insured damages. Weather events include storms and tornadoes, flooding, drought, heat waves, wildfire, and cold weather, but not earthquakes and tsunamis.

“It seems to have become the norm that at least one secondary peril event such as a severe flooding, winter storm or wildfire each year results in losses of more than $10 billion,” Martin Bertogg, head of catastrophic perils at Swiss Re, said in a statement.

The insured losses this year from weather events are the third costliest since Swiss Re began tracking them in 1970. The largest weather-related losses—$152 billion—occurred in 2017 when hurricanes devastated Puerto Rico, Texas, Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In 2005, there were $141 billion in insured losses, caused largely by Hurricane Katrina.

Swiss Re’s analysis includes only losses that are covered by insurance, which the company acknowledges excludes tens of billions of dollars of uninsured damage, particularly in Europe, where there is a “very large flood protection gap.”

By contrast, NOAA’s preliminary estimate for the total damage caused by Ida is $64.5 billion, with the losses occurring mostly in Louisiana, New York and New Jersey.

Disaster modeling firm Karen Clark & Co. estimated yesterday that the recent tornadoes caused around $3 billion in total damage. The damage was concentrated in Kentucky, where hundreds of homes and businesses were destroyed, and also occurred in Arkansas, Illinois, Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee.

The $3 billion estimate is far less than the $11 billion in damage that NOAA says occurred when tornadoes devastated 15 states from Texas to Pennsylvania in May 2011 and killed 158 people in Joplin, Mo.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2021. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe