Glowing Antibiotics Reveal Bacterial Infections

Vancomycin treated with a fluorescent dye allows real-time imaging of bacterial growth

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Despite surgeons’ best efforts, bacteria often manage to sneak onto medical implants such as bone screws, where they can cause severe infections. Research published today in Nature Communications suggests that using fluorescent antibiotics could reveal such infections before they become too severe.

Lead author Marleen van Oosten, a microbiologist at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, says that the only way to distinguish normal post-surgical swelling from an infection at an implant site is to perform a biopsy on the affected tissue, which is itself an invasive procedure. Sometimes such infections grow for years before being diagnosed correctly.

To better spot microbes in the body, van Oosten and her colleagues colored the antibiotic vancomycin with a fluorescent dye to help identify infected tissues. The drug inserts itself into the thick cell walls of bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus; the addition of the dye makes the cell walls glow.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers injected S. aureus-infected mice with a very small amount of the antibiotic — enough to make the bacteria glow when viewed under a fluorescent microscope, but not enough to kill them. The team then implanted metal plates coated with the fluorescent antibiotic into the shin bone of a human cadaver, 8 millimeters below the skin. Some of the plates had been covered with Staphylococcus epidermidis, a bacterium that grows on human skin. When the researchers photographed the leg with a camera that detects fluorescence, they could see these plates glowing.

Fighting infections
Niren Murthy, a biomedical engineer at the University of California, Berkeley, says that the approach is interesting, and that a new way to detect infections is badly needed. Only some bacteria will bind to vancomycin, so physicians will be able to narrow down the cause an infection and thus how to fight it.

But Murthy says that it is not clear whether the fluorescent vancomycin molecules will be bright enough for a scanner to detect them deep in a living human body, especially if not many bacteria are present.

Van Oosten hopes that the technique can soon be used on people. Both vancomycin and the dye that her group used are already known to be safe in humans.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on October 15, 2013.

Sara Reardon is a freelance biomedical journalist based in Bozeman, Mont. She is a former staff reporter at Nature, New Scientist and Science and has a master’s degree in molecular biology.

More by Sara Reardon

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe