New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

GM Pollen Spreads Much Farther Than Previously Thought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers have tracked the spread of genes from genetically modified (GM) grass plants to measure how far wind carries their pollen. They report in a paper published online today by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that the modified genes appeared in normal plants up to 21 kilometers away, and also showed up in close relatives of the original plants. The results bolster concerns about the unintentional spread of genes from GM crops.

The team took advantage of a test field of creeping bentgrass several square kilometers in size that lawn-care giant Scotts planted in Oregon in 2003. The test plants were genetically modified to resist the popular herbicide glyphosate, marketed as Roundup. Creeping bentgrass, Agrostis stolonifera L., carpets golf courses worldwide, but the plant and its close relatives also grow wild in most of the U.S.

To assess how far GM pollen spreads, the scientists placed more than 100 "sentinel" plants at various distances from the test field. After the pollination season, they gathered and raised seeds from the sentinel plants and from related plants growing wild in the same area. Seedlings that survived exposure to Roundup were tested to confirm the protein and genetic signatures of the modification. The modified genes were most prevalent in plants grown from seeds collected within a few kilometers of the test field, but plants carrying GM genes also grew from seeds found as far as 21 kilometers away--much farther than previously reported. Lead author Lidia Watrud of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says that the small, easily blown grass pollen and the large scale of the test field helped the researchers to see the effect at such long distances. "If anything that's an underestimate," she adds, because there were no test plants farther away. Wild plants belonging to the same species and to a different species in the same genus also acquired the modified gene.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The U.S. grows many GM crops, including food crops, but most of them are not thought to cross-pollinate with wild relatives. In Europe and other countries, however, there is widespread opposition to GM crops. Although creeping bentgrass is not part of the food supply, some farmers are concerned that they would be unable to sell seeds that acquire the modified gene.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe