New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

GM Tomato Tastes Better

Taste testers prefer tomatoes that carry a flavor-enhancing gene

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Shoppers who miss the taste of farm-grown tomatoes may find solace in a new technology that puts back what generations of breeding for hardiness and shelf life have taken out. A new variety of tomato has been genetically modified (GM) to produce geraniol, a rose-smelling compound found in fruits and flowers. In a blind taste test, 60 percent of 37 testers preferred the flavor of the GM tomato, according to a study published online this week in Nature Biotechnology.

The result proves that genetic modification can potentially restore some of the flavor and aroma lost as breeders have created more durable strains of tomatoes and other crops, says biotechnologist Efraim Lewinsohn of the Newe Ya'ar Research Center in Ramat Yishay, Israel, who led the research. "You often sit down in living rooms and people complain tomatoes don't taste like they used to," he says.

In an effort to banish such idle supper time chatter forever, Lewinsohn and colleagues gave extra-large cherry tomatoes [see image above] a geraniol-synthesizing gene from the lemon basil plant. The modified tomato does not taste exactly like a traditional tomato, but it does noticeably change and enhance the flavor—something that GM technology has not achieved before, Lewinsohn says. Tomatoes contain more than 400 volatiles, or potentially fragrant compounds, and researchers have yet to identify the most important contributors to the classic tomato taste.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The team found that tomatoes broke down geraniol into at least ten other lemon- and rose-smelling compounds. Taste testers described the fruit as smelling like rose, geranium and lemongrass. One side effect of the change was a reduction in lycopene, a red carotenoid pigment, which gave the tomatoes a more orange hue.

Lewinsohn says the commercial acceptance of this or any other flavor-enhanced tomato would depend on consumer tastes and attitudes. He adds that, in principle, flavor improvement could come from more traditional breeding instead of GM technology, which is unpopular in European countries.

Another possible source of better-tasting tomatoes is the local farmers' market—or even the backyard garden—but Lewinsohn notes that locally grown tomatoes are not available year-round. "If you want commercial production of good quality tomatoes," he says, "that's more difficult."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe