New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Going through the Brownian Motions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In addition to relativity, Albert Einstein explained Brownian motion, the dance of minute particles when suspended in fluids, by showing that impacts with surrounding molecules could create this random jittering. Theorists have argued that Brownian motion may not be completely random, as Einstein predicted, and now experimentalists have confirmed it. They tracked micron-size plastic and glass spheres in water with lasers at microsecond intervals and nanometer-length scales. Their results validate a corrected form of the standard theory describing Brownian motion, wherein the inertia of the fluid makes the trajectories of the particles more predictable for much longer than previously expected. The findings, published October 11 online by Physical Review Letters, are fundamental to understanding the dynamics of a living cell and building structures at the nanoscale, says biophysicist Ernst-Ludwig Florin of the University of Texas at Austin.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Going through the Brownian Motions” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 6 (), p. 36
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1205-36d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe