New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Going Up?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Pat Rawling/NASA

Now more than two decades after Arthur C. Clarke penned The Fountains of Paradise, space elevators like the one his book described are no longer science fiction. In a recent NASA report (the product of a workshop held at the Marshall Space Flight Center last year), David Smitherman outlines just how researchers might go about constructing such a giant ride.

First, they would need to build a base tower approximately 50 kilometers tall, out of the wind for stability and near the equator for alignment with the geostationary Earth orbit (GEO). The elevator itself would be a long cable tethered to the base tower such that its center of mass was at GEO, some 35,786 kilometers above Earth's surface. Four to six tracks would run up the outside of the tower and cable, carrying electromagnetic vehicles at speeds reaching thousands of kilometers per hour to platforms at various levels. The illustration shows the view from one such platform, looking back towards Earth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Space elevators, Smitherman concedes, are still some 50 years off: "First, we'll develop the technology," which calls for much stronger materials and higher-speed electromagnetic transit systems, among other things. But the payoff could be enormous: per kilogram of payload, scientists at the workshop estimated the elevator to cost about $1.50 to GEO, compared with the space shuttle's $22,000.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe