Going Up?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Pat Rawling/NASA

Now more than two decades after Arthur C. Clarke penned The Fountains of Paradise, space elevators like the one his book described are no longer science fiction. In a recent NASA report (the product of a workshop held at the Marshall Space Flight Center last year), David Smitherman outlines just how researchers might go about constructing such a giant ride.

First, they would need to build a base tower approximately 50 kilometers tall, out of the wind for stability and near the equator for alignment with the geostationary Earth orbit (GEO). The elevator itself would be a long cable tethered to the base tower such that its center of mass was at GEO, some 35,786 kilometers above Earth's surface. Four to six tracks would run up the outside of the tower and cable, carrying electromagnetic vehicles at speeds reaching thousands of kilometers per hour to platforms at various levels. The illustration shows the view from one such platform, looking back towards Earth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Space elevators, Smitherman concedes, are still some 50 years off: "First, we'll develop the technology," which calls for much stronger materials and higher-speed electromagnetic transit systems, among other things. But the payoff could be enormous: per kilogram of payload, scientists at the workshop estimated the elevator to cost about $1.50 to GEO, compared with the space shuttle's $22,000.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe