Gold Deposits in Canada

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The provincial geologist of Canada, in his reportfor the year 1851 '52, gives an account of gold washings on the river Du Loup, at its junction with the Chaudiere, in which he states that during the present season 1,900 pennyweights of gold have been obtained by fifteen men employed by the company engaged in working the deposit. Much time and money were lost in consequence of their dam being carried away, but on the whole the labor has been remunerative. The other minerals found in connection with the gold and iron sand, a small quantity of platinum, and irrodium with an indication of mercury. Several prospectors, both American and Canadian, have traversed the country around, and have been successful also in finding the precious metal in other localities, but had not succeeded in making its collection profitable. The geologist concludes, from the evidence collected, that the deposits are not generally sufficiently rich to render their working remunerative to unskilled labor; and that agriculturists and others engaged in the ordinary occupations of the country, would only lose their time and labor by turning gold-hunt ers.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Gold Deposits in Canada” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 6 (), p. 43
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican10231852-43b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe