On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Inventors came up with these great ideas based on the sincere belief that somebody, somewhere, would find value in them, either by saving time, effort or money, or by deriving some other benefit. Some of these inventions were on track to be patented, some were perhaps merely for the greater good. The U.S. patent system rewards new devices or processes with legal protection from competition in the marketplace, enabling the holder of a successful patent to make money from his or her creativity if he or she chooses to do so. This system has helped propel progress in this country since the first patent was granted in 1790. Out of the 9,000,000 inventions patented so far, however, only a few of them have been truly worthwhile. Most inventions, patented or not, have some fatal flaw, or are unrealistic in some way, or are just not as useful as they were thought to be. Here, then, are some optimistic inventions from the year 1865. Hail to the inventor, but better luck next time!
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
