Good Vibrations Make Magnesium Boride a Model Superconductor

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: courtesy of T. YILDIRIM/NIST

Early this past March, Japanese researchers described in Nature their discovery of a new and unexpected high-temperature superconductor, magnesium boride (MgB2). The material has since gained a great deal of attention, in no small part because it's cheap to make, easy to manipulate and superconducting at 39 K, which is much warmer than any other metal-containing superconductor.

Until recently, physicsts couldn't explain how MgB2 becomes superconducting at a temperature some 33 percent warmer than theory predicts. But two independent papers in Physical Review Letters now offer the remarkable answer: vibrations in the material's crystal lattice and its conducting electrons move in step, allowing the electrons to pass through the lattice undeterred¿much like partners who duck other couples' linked arms in a well-choreographed line dance.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ray Osborne and colleagues at Argonne National Laboratories reported in the July 2nd PRL that electrons zipping past boron atoms in MgB2 quite easily "pluck" the crystal lattice, like a guitar string. The resulting vibration allows two electrons to form a so-called Cooper pair, which then travels resistance-free through the material. Another account in today's PRL from Jeff Lynn and Taner Yildirim at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and their colleagues confirms the earlier work. They further show just how perfectly coupled the lattice vibration is to the conducting electrons. The timing is so perfect, in fact, that the scientists say it will be hard to tweak the material to raise its superconducting temperature any higher.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe