Graphene’s Dark Side

The wonder material may pose risks if spilled

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Graphene is one popular nanomaterial. Made from single-atom-thick sheets of carbon, it is the strongest material ever tested and boasts superlative electronic properties, too. After a decade of research, it is on the verge of moving from the laboratory into commercial technologies, perhaps appearing soon as lightweight airplane parts or batteries with incredible capacities.

So now might be a good time to anticipate potential risks posed by graphene, before workers are exposed to it or it gets into the water supply, says Sharon Walker, an environmental engineer at the University of California, Riverside. In research described in May in Environmental Engineering Science, Walker's group observed how one form of the material, graphene oxide, behaves in water.

Walker found that in a solution mimicking groundwater, graphene oxide clumped and sank, suggesting it is not a risk. That was not the case in a solution mimicking surface water, which includes lakes and storage tanks for drinking water. Instead of falling to the bottom, it stuck to the organic matter produced by decomposing plants and animals and floated around. Such mobility might increase the chances that animals and people could ingest graphene oxide, which has shown toxicity in some early studies in mice and human lung cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This is a good first glimpse of how graphene might behave in the water supply,” Walker says. If these materials do turn out to pose a risk to human health, their mobility in surface water could be a big problem. She hopes these studies are early enough in the conversation to inform how industry develops graphene and its derivatives and how agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, regulate them.

Katherine Bourzac is a journalist based in San Francisco, who covers environment, climate, chemistry, health and computing for Nature, Science News, and other publications.

More by Katherine Bourzac
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Graphene's Dark Side” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 1 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0714-19a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe