New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Bird Family Tree Gets a Makeover

In the most thorough genomic investigation to date, some birds perch on new branches

Jen Christiansen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Classifying birds by plumage and other anatomical features served scientists well over the centuries, but genetic analyses have opened up a world of detail about avian family ties. An international group of researchers recently developed a tree based on the full genomes of 48 species, representing every major bird lineage—the most thorough genetic study of a large branch on the tree of life to date. The massive effort, with more than 200 collaborators, includes investigations of the emergence and disappearance of teeth, the origin of vocal learning, and the timing of the explosion of bird diversity.

The new tree confirms many past observations, such as the common ancestor of the core landbirds. It also resolves some controversial links. Who might have guessed, for instance, that pigeons and flamingos are close cousins?

Credit: Jen Christiansen; Sources: “Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds,” by Erich D. Jarvis et al., in Science, Vol. 346; December 12, 2014 (left tree); “Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy,” Part II: “Analysis and discussion,” by Bradley C. Livezey and Richard L. Zusi, in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 149, No. 1; January 2007 (right tree)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More classification notes:

In addition to 48 bird genomes, the researchers sequenced three crocodilian genomes to pinpoint early descendent relationships.

The separation of penguins, pelicans and ibis from flamingos and grebes (and pigeons) implies that the waterbird trait evolved independently multiple times.

Because of how quickly both land birds and waterbirds evolved, the data suggests that the original ancestors might have been birds that lived along the coastline.

Chickens share the most DNA with the first bird ancestor, closely followed by hoatzin and emu.

Sarah Lewin Frasier is a senior editor at Scientific American. She plans, assigns and edits the Advances section of the monthly magazine, as well as editing online news, and she launched Scientific American’s Games section in 2024. Before joining Scientific American in 2019, she chronicled humanity’s journey to the stars as associate editor at Space.com. (And even earlier, she was a print intern at Scientific American.) Frasier holds an A.B. in mathematics from Brown University and an M.A. in journalism from New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program. She enjoys musical theater and mathematical paper craft.

More by Sarah Lewin Frasier
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 4This article was published with the title “A Genetic Guide to Birds” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 4 (), p. 84
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0415-84

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe