Great Steam Plowing Match

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At the recent show of the Royal Agricultural Society, held at Chester, England, on the Uth ult., five steam plows contested for the handsome prize of 500 ($2,425). Four of the plows were operated by steam engines fixed en the field and moving the " shares" back and forth by ropes and windlassel. The fifth plow (Boydells') had a traction engine which moved over the field. Each of these turned over four furrows at once, and the work was well done by them, all but one, which broke down. The soil was a hard, dry stiff clay. FlIlTOwa of nine inches depth were turned over, and the eompetition was very spirited. The euccessful plow was Fowler's; it executed one 'Bnd three-quarters of an acre in two hours. By offering high prizes for steam plows by our agricultural societies, positive success would soon be achieved. Charles F. Mann, of Troy, N. Y., has recently put in operation a steam plow, which we Lave heard well spoken of by those who have seen it work.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 50This article was published with the title “Great Steam Plowing Match” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 50 (), p. 397
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08211858-397c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe