Green Funds Remain Hot in Cooling Economy

Investors are still keen to buy stocks and funds that are ecologically friendly

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Even though U.S. financial markets have cooled in 2008, investments in “clean technology” from firms such as Silicon Valley–based Khosla Ventures have remained hot. Clean technology—products and services that harness renewable resources and limit environmental impacts—has emerged as one of the top three asset classes for venture capitalists. “The past five years have seen significant increases in interest and investment in this area,” says Ron Pernick, co-author of The Clean Tech Revolution. Venture capital totaled $2 billion in the second quarter of 2008—a new record—and was up 48 percent from the first quarter despite the economic downturn.

The market’s large size and its potential for addressing important global challenges will continue to drive investments, according to Samir Kaul, a founding partner at Khosla Ventures, one of the top five clean-tech investors. Utility-scale solar power plants and second-generation biofuels such as algae have led the field in recent financing rounds, but funding is now branching into less developed technologies such as bioplastics, green building materials and water desalination.

Note: This story was originally published with the title, "Green Funds Remain Hot".

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American