Greener Cretaceous Pastures

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Paleontologists had thought that grass evolved well after dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago. Now Swedish researchers studying “coprolites”—fossilized dino doo—have discovered tiny silica crystals characteristic of relatively evolved grasses. These bits of undigested plant matter, or phytoliths, come from a site containing bones of titanosaurs, longnecked plant eaters that lived near the end of the dinosaurs' reign. The five different grass phytoliths date back 65 million to 67 million years, meaning grass first sprouted up to 100 million years ago, the researchers guess. They speculate the grasses were tall, herbaceous and, based on the coprolites' other contents, just a small part of the dino's diet. Graze the November 18, 2005, Science to digest the findings.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 294 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Greener Cretaceous Pastures” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 294 No. 2 (), p. 28
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0206-28c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe