Greenest Skylines: LEED Certification Changes Cities

Leadership in energy and environmental design practices are becoming part of building codes in cities around the U.S.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An increasing number of cities are improving building efficiency in response to legislation or pressure from green organizations. Many are working with the U.S. Green Building Council to leverage the council’s LEED certification system, which codifies steps that can be taken in new and refurbished buildings to minimize environmental impact. Attaining LEED certification “isn’t niche anymore, it’s mainstream,” says Marie E. Coleman, council spokesperson.

Some cities are even incorporating measures from LEED into their building codes to force change. “We went through the building code word by word,” says Lora-Marie Bernard, executive director of the council’s Houston chapter. “Making it stricter, by using things like cool roofs and Energy Star, creates a brand-new landscape for this industry.”

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also added a spotlight on municipal efforts in March, when it released a list of the 25 cities with the most buildings certified as energy-efficient by the agency’s Energy Star program. Number one was Los Angeles, with 262 buildings. San Francisco was second with 194 buildings. Rounding out the top 10 were Houston; Washington, D.C.; Dallas–Fort Worth; Chicago; Denver; Minneapolis–St. Paul; Atlanta; and Seattle.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Greenest Skylines."

SA Special Editions Vol 19 Issue 2sThis article was published with the title “Inspirations” in SA Special Editions Vol. 19 No. 2s (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanearth0609-10c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe