Greenland Meltdown Driven by Collapse of Glaciers at Ocean Outlets [Slide Show]

The interactions between the island's glaciers and the surrounding seas may be driving ice loss, according to aerial photographs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Future sea levels depend on how much and how quickly the massive ice sheet covering Greenland melts. Satellite-based measurements have revealed that Greenland's glaciers are melting and on the move—and the ice sheet has lost some 36 billion metric tons of ice each year in recent years from its northwestern flank. Thanks to weird weather, nearly the entire ice-covered surface of the world's largest island melted for a period this year.

View a slide show of Greenland's meltdown.

Now aerial photographs reveal that this loss of ice is driven more by the accelerated breakdown of ice sheets where they reach the sea (and a subsequent speed up in outflowing ice) than the difference between snowfall and such surface melt. Danish scientists identified two periods of ice loss—1985 to 1993 and 2005 to 2010—that have been responsible for the bulk of Greenland's meltdown. The research appears in Science on August 3.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In fact, outlet glaciers have receded by more than 100 meters across the northwestern edge of the ice sheet. For example, the Sverdrup Glacier retreated by 1,000 meters between 2005 and 2010, also losing 80 meters in height. Roughly 80 percent of the ice loss seems to be attributable to this kind of loss at glacier outlets rather than the glacier as a whole. The cause may be warmer ocean temperatures, although sea-surface temperature measurements are lacking to definitely prove that hypothesis.

Aerial maps that extend the record back as far as the 1930s may help further refine scientists' understanding of this meltdown in the north—and its implications for how much the seas will rise in coming decades.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe