Grocery Data Could Warn of Anthrax Outbreaks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Surges in grocery sales of over-the-counter drugs could alert officials to anthrax outbreaks, scientists say. Currently, authorities rely on data from medical and public health sources to detect large-scale anthrax exposure. But according to a report published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, tracking the sales of such common medications as cough syrup might be more effective than traditional detection methods in revealing outbreaks early on and could therefore help reduce mortality in such cases.

People infected with anthrax generally seek medical attention only once severe symptoms develop, after which death can follow within hours, note study authors Anna Goldenberg and colleagues from Carnegie Mellon University. But initially, the bacterium behind anthrax causes merely flu-like symptoms. At that point, victims are more likely to self-medicate with things like cough syrup than they are to visit a doctor. The researchers thus reason that the "outbreak footprint" would probably exist in the records of over-the-counter medication sales earlier than in medical or public health data.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To evaluate their proposed detection system, Goldenberg and her team simulated an outbreak based on data from the purportedly accidental anthrax release that occurred in Sverdlovsk, Russia, in 1979. They determined that in the case of an outbreak, cough syrup sales would jump unexpectedly by at least 36 percent within the first three days.

Although they control for factors such as seasonal outbreaks of the flu, "false alarms can still occur for various reasons," the researchers note. "But the purpose of such systems is early warning, and they require careful follow-up with medical assessment and other information on possible exposure to a bioagent."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe