Growth Industry: Honeybee Numbers Expand Worldwide as U.S. Decline Continues

Despite serious losses to colonies in the U.S. and Europe, honeybees are on the rise in other parts of the world--although hardly keeping pace with growing demand

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Even as U.S. honeybee populations have been hit hard by colony collapse disorder in recent years, domesticated beehives have been thriving elsewhere.

In an analysis of nearly 50 years of data on bees from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, researchers found that domesticated honeybee populations have increased about 45 percent, thanks in large part to expansion of the bees into areas such as South America, eastern Asia and Africa. The results appear in the latest issue Current Biology.

The overall increase, however, is not what surprised Marcelo Aizen, a professor at the National University of Comahue in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and lead author of the study. Instead, he was taken aback by the sixfold increase in the growth rate of crops that depend on domesticated bees for pollination.

Booming demand for honey and a rise in foods that depend on bees for pollination are fueling the increase in bee colonies.

Many food staples, such as wheat, corn and rice, don't need bees. But plenty of fruits and vegetables that are now mainstays—from apples to zucchini—need help from pollinators like bees.

Demand for royal jelly, bee pollen and propolis (bee glue) has also contributed to the rise in beekeeping in some places, notes Eric Mussen, an apiculturist at the University of California, Davis, who wasn't involved in the study. But it is honey that accounts for most of the growth for bees across the globe.

The common domestic honeybee (Apis mellifera) was brought to the New World from Europe in the 17th century. Since then it has been responsible for keeping many crops (which were also imported) bountiful.

As the mysterious collapse disorder continues to claim hives by the hundreds—threatening, in particular, the almond industry—more attention is being paid other pollinators, including other types of bees such as solitary bees and feral honeybees.

Aizen explains that although "honeybees are the most frequent pollinator, they're not necessarily the most efficient." He points to the proficiency of local pollinators, such as bumblebees, to take care of crops such as squash and cucumber.

Paradoxically, as more land around the globe is put to agricultural use for pollination-dependent crops, indigenous bee species get crowded out. And as the native pollinators go, so, too, might some local floras that need specialized pollination, the study authors note.

Both Aizen and Mussen see this as an important time to reevaluate global food needs and goals. If healthful, pollination-dependent fruits and vegetables are to remain an important constituent of human diets worldwide, Mussen notes, more land—and even more pollinators—will be necessarily.

And although the overall growth in the world honeybee population might sound an encouraging note, Aizen remains cautious. "I think that there is a problem," he says about areas where their populations are shrinking. "I'm not saying that there isn't a problem…. But I think that we should change the perspective of the problem so it's not a question of supply but a question of changing demand."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe