Guessing This Winter's Weather

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: JPL

Now that North America is waving good-bye to three years of weird weather--brought on by back-to-back El Ni¿o/La Ni¿a episodes--forecasters are wondering whether things will at last return to normal this winter. The trouble is that disagreement over the dynamics of another ocean temperature pattern, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), is making it hard to tell. "Anybody who makes a hard and fast forecast this winter has definitely got a better Ouija board then me," says William Patzert, an oceanographer with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Patzert believes that the PDO, a 20- to 40-year cycle affecting sea surface temperatures, is in its "negative" phase: cooler temperatures in the east and center of the Pacific are surrounded by a horseshoe of warmer waters to the north, west and south. He points to recent images from the U.S.-French TOPEX/Poseidon satellite as evidence (right). And if he is correct, this negative phase, which acts in essence like a big La Ni¿a spread out over the entire Pacific, would make for more unusual winter weather.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But knowledge of the PDO is only four years old, and so no one, including Patzert, is making any bets. Some scientists don't even agree that the PDO is in its negative phase. "I looked at the ocean temperature anomalies just recently for the North Pacific and there's still some residual ... negative PDO indications up there," says Vernon Kousky of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Prediction Center, "but the pattern is broken up and does not look as coherent as it did, say, six months ago or so. We expect to see a much more normal-ish winter pattern." Maybe it's best to prepare for anything.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe