Meet the Microbes Eating the Gulf Oil Spill [Slide Show]

These microscopic life forms are blooming as a result of the oil spilled into the Gulf of Mexico from the Macondo 252 deep-sea well

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Deepwater Horizon oil spill added roughly 800 million liters of hydrocarbons to the Gulf of Mexico. One quarter of that has been burned, captured or skimmed, according to U.S. government estimates. That leaves the rest for trillions of microbes to feast on—a petroleum cornucopia that first became available April 20 when the oil platform exploded and the spill started.

If the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy, Carol Browner, are to be believed, those microbes have made quick work of the spill, consuming as much as 50 percent of the remaining oil already. Actually, the bacteria, fungi and other life that consume hydrocarbons do not work that fast, taking weeks to months to years to degrade oil. And, unfortunately, the microbes' speed is limited not by the availability of oil—or even its droplet size, which is why chemical dispersants have been used to break up the oil into microbe-friendly globules—but by the availability of various nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus that wash into the ocean via rivers carrying sediments from the continents.

Bioremediation—boosting microbial activity by ensuring a steady supply of such nutrients—is quite difficult in a case like the gusher in the Gulf of Mexico. "In the ocean how do you keep the nutrients with the oil?" says microbial ecologist Kenneth Lee, director of the Center for Offshore Oil, Gas and Energy Research with Fisheries and Oceans Canada, who has been assisting with BP's mess. "That's why you don't see bioremediation in the open ocean."

But the microbes will eventually devour all of BP's Gulf of Mexico oil spill—no matter where it ends up—except the heaviest, nastiest stuff: asphaltenes and other big-chain hydrocarbons that go on to form the millions of tar balls dotting the world's oceans. After all, roads would not be coated in the stuff if a slick biofilm of bacteria was going to form on them.

Surveys of the specific species—many potentially new to science—consuming the Gulf oil spill are ongoing, but preliminary results reveal some of the usual suspects, along with potentially unexpected members of various orders and genuses. After all, there are potentially thousands of microbial species that consume the hydrocarbons that make up oil—both in the water, on land, underground and even, possibly, in the air—and scientists have only described a fraction of them. Following is a slide show of some of the relatives doing the heroic work of cleansing the Gulf in ways that humans still cannot mimic.
View a slide show of oil-eating microbes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe