Gun Explosion at Gibraltar

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Gibraltar Chronicle of the 22nd Oct. gives an account ot a gun explosion while a portion of the garrison were carrying on gun practice with red hot shot. A 32 pounder, 9 feet 6 inches long, and weighing 56 cwt., charged with 10 lbs. of powder, a dry wad and a wet one, and 32 lbs. iron hot shot, having mis-fired, was reprimed and fired by percussion-hammer and tube. On the charge being ignited, the gun burst, scattering the carriage to atoms, the splinters of which knocked down six of the unfortunate gun detachment on the spot, wounding two of them. The metal part<:!d into a dozen pieces ; four immense masses of several hundred weight each, were hurled nearly a hundred feet into the air and carried to a distance of nearly 300 yards trom the platform on which the gun was standing; and the breech thrown to the rear, across the battery and public road, killed an ass on which a little boy—who miraculously escaped unhurt—was mounted. The whole battery was for an instant enveloped in smoke, and the panic which ensued during its clearing away was one of such intense anxiety as to baffle description. When we consider what a vast number of the military were at the guns, and the concourse of spectators,' among whom were some Moors of distinction, it is passing wonderful that so few were hurt; and, above all, that only two cases may be deemed dangerous.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 12This article was published with the title “Gun Explosion at Gibraltar” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 12 (), p. 91
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12041852-91b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe