Half the World Could Be Nearsighted by 2050

Nearsightedness is on the rise

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The childhood insult “Four eyes!” may one day apply to most of us. By 2050, according to a new report from the Brien Holden Vision Institute in Australia, almost half the world will be nearsighted and require some form of corrective lens, up from a quarter of the global population in 2000. Conventional wisdom puts the blame for the rise in myopia on reading and staring at computer screens, but little evidence supports that hypothesis. Current thinking holds that people, especially children, spend too little time outside—a handful of studies show that lack of sunlight exposure from long periods indoors correlates with myopia.

Either way, heredity clearly plays a smaller role than previously thought. “Myopia, once believed to be almost totally genetic, is in fact a socially determined disease,” says Ian Morgan, an ophthalmology researcher at the Australian National University. The finding suggests an intervention: a recent trial revealed that children who spent an extra 40 minutes outside each day for three years were less likely to become myopic than those who did not.

Two charts show that myopia prevalence is expected to grow dramatically by 2050, by both age group and region.

Tiffany Farrant-Gonzalez; Sources: “Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050,” By Brien A. Holden et al., in Ophthamology (in press) (myopia prevalence data); Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study, Institute for Heath Metrics and Evaluation (classifications by high-income region)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Diana Kwon is a freelance journalist who covers health and the life sciences. She is based in Berlin.

More by Diana Kwon
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Can You Read This from a Distance?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 6 (), p. 80
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0616-80

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe