New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Half the World Could Be Nearsighted by 2050

Nearsightedness is on the rise

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The childhood insult “Four eyes!” may one day apply to most of us. By 2050, according to a new report from the Brien Holden Vision Institute in Australia, almost half the world will be nearsighted and require some form of corrective lens, up from a quarter of the global population in 2000. Conventional wisdom puts the blame for the rise in myopia on reading and staring at computer screens, but little evidence supports that hypothesis. Current thinking holds that people, especially children, spend too little time outside—a handful of studies show that lack of sunlight exposure from long periods indoors correlates with myopia.

Either way, heredity clearly plays a smaller role than previously thought. “Myopia, once believed to be almost totally genetic, is in fact a socially determined disease,” says Ian Morgan, an ophthalmology researcher at the Australian National University. The finding suggests an intervention: a recent trial revealed that children who spent an extra 40 minutes outside each day for three years were less likely to become myopic than those who did not.

Two charts show that myopia prevalence is expected to grow dramatically by 2050, by both age group and region.

Tiffany Farrant-Gonzalez; Sources: “Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050,” By Brien A. Holden et al., in Ophthamology (in press) (myopia prevalence data); Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study, Institute for Heath Metrics and Evaluation (classifications by high-income region)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Diana Kwon is a freelance journalist who covers health and the life sciences. She is based in Berlin.

More by Diana Kwon
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Can You Read This from a Distance?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 6 (), p. 80
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0616-80

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe