New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Halting Chemotherapy-Induced Hair Loss

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy often experience hair loss. Although temporary, this effect is emotionally distressing, a constant visual reminder of the individual's condition. But the results of research published today in the journal Science may point the way to preventing such chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). Many anti-cancer drugs that lead to CIA target specific phases of the cell cycle. As a result, they prove selectively toxic to cells undergoing division. The epithelium of the hair follicle is particularly sensitive to these effects because it divides so rapidly. Previous studies had shown that inhibiting cell cycle progression diminishes the toxicity of the drugs.

So with that mind, Stephen T. Davis of Glaxo Wellcome and his colleagues set out to determine whether restraining CDK2, the so-called protein kinase that directs progression of the cell cycle, might provide the necessary control over hair follicle cell division to halt CIA. They thus developed a group of synthetic CDK2 inhibitors and found that treatment with these compounds reduced hair loss in 33 to 50 percent of CIA rats. Applying the compounds topically to the scalp limits systemic exposure and avoids the danger of diluting the chemotherapy's anti-tumor efficacy. "On the basis of the evidence presented here," the authors assert, "clinical trials in cancer patients to assess the efficacy of this approach to prevent CIA may be warranted."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe