New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Hand Weights Enhanced Ancient Athletes' Performances

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most performance-enhancing tricks used by today's Olympic athletes can only be detected using high-tech laboratory tests. But ancient Olympic athletes, it seems, used a more obvious method to improve their results: hand weights. According to a report published today in the journal Nature, standing long jumpers used stone or lead pieces known as halteres to travel farther.

Although it might seem that jumping with lead weights would be a disadvantage, Alberto E. Minetti and Luca P. Ardigo of Manchester Metropolitan University found that holding halteres of a certain size could actually propel a long jumper farther. Using a computer model of a long jumper and observations of jumping volunteers, the researchers studied how the presence of various weights affected performance. They found that a jumper swinging a pair of halteres weighing a total of six kilograms experienced a take-off speed 2 percent greater than his empty-handed counterpart did. In fact, the halteres only became a hindrance when their weight exceeded about 10 kilograms.

The team further found that skilled swinging of the weights--that is, thrusting them forward on take-off and backward just before landing--could add 17 centimeters to what would have been a three meter jump. Because haltere specimens recovered by archaeologists (top image) range in mass from two to nine kilograms and vase paintings (bottom image) depict the optimum form of haltere swinging, Minetti and Ardigo conclude that athletes in ancient times had worked out these advantages for themselves.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe