New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Hans Albrecht Bethe, 1906-2005

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I met Hans Bethe 10 years ago, on the morning of his festschrift, a kind of preposthumous memorial that physicists throw for a retiring giant. It was to be an ambitious, two-day event, for Bethe's career spanned almost the entire length and breadth of nuclear physics. In his early years, he worked with Ernest Rutherford, Niels Bohr and Enrico Fermi and then soared to fame with his Nobel Prize–winning discovery in 1938 of how nuclear fires light the stars. He became head theoretician on the Manhattan Project and later helped to explain how aging stars can transform into bombs, exploding as supernovae.

As we talked in his office at Cornell University, Bethe kept steering our conversation toward the ramifications of nuclear science. Like Albert Einstein, Hans Bethe was a citizen-scientist who tried to persuade society to wield the power of atoms wisely. In articles that Bethe published in this magazine, he made the case for nuclear nonproliferation treaties (1950), cautioned against missile defense systems (1968 and 1984), and predicted the necessity of a gradual shift from fossil fuels (1976). As with his scientific discoveries, these insights have withstood the test of time. He died quietly in his Ithaca, N.Y., home on March 6 at the age of 98.

W. Wayt Gibbs is a contributing editor for Scientific American based in Seattle. He also works as a scientific editor at Intellectual Ventures.

More by W. Wayt Gibbs
Scientific American Magazine Vol 292 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Hans Albrecht Bethe, 1906-2005” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 292 No. 5 (), p. 36
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0505-36a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe