Head Spaces

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

“Does ‘accommodate’ have one ‘m’ or two?” asked an editor in our open workspace. Almost before I could say “two,” the boss flew at us from her office. “Why aren’t you working?” she demanded. She seemed mollified by my explanation. She stalked back to her office chair, periodically watching us through the glass window in the wall.

None of us focused too well for a while after that. But her whipsaw behavior was only part of the reason. As I now know—and as you will learn from “Cubicle, Sweet Cubicle,” by sociologists S. Alexander Haslam and Craig Knight—the workspace itself already had done most of the productivity damage. We could not put what we wanted atop our desks, lest we ruin the cohesive look. The seating was changed without discussion. The lack of control over our situation interfered with our concentration. It’s not difficult, however, to create better workspaces. Click here to learn how.

We can adjust a physical environment to foster emotional well-being. But what happens when a person lacks emotion? The disturbing consequence: psychopaths, whose behavior ranges in severity from self-interested opportunists to remorseless killers; they may constitute 15 to 35 percent of prisoners in the U.S. They can charm by portraying emotion and empathy, yet they do not experience such feelings, write neuroscientists Kent A. Kiehl and Joshua W. Buckholtz in our cover story, “Inside the Mind of a Psychopath.” Because of a brain abnormality, they have, in effect, a learning disability that impairs emotional development. A new understanding of the mechanisms behind psychopathy ultimately could lead to treatments, perhaps including medicines and effective behavioral therapies.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Another kind of understanding—about how children learn—has the power to enhance cognition in young minds. In our special report, we explore how physical actions influence how kids think. Touch, for instance, is essential to learning. Gestures can help make abstract ideas concrete. And exercise boosts brainpower. In this back-to-school season, click here for an educational experience.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 4This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 4 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0910-1

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe