Hearing Babies of Deaf Parents 'Babble' with their Hands

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists have long debated why babies babble. Some maintain that a seven-month old's 'ooos' and 'aaas' just pop out when she opens and closes her mouth. Others suggest that babbling shows a baby's growing sensitivity to the patterns and rhythms of human speech. A new experiment, reported today in Nature, lends credence to the second idea. Laura Ann Petitto of Dartmouth College and her colleagues studied the hand movements of hearing infants born to profoundly deaf parents and found that these children seem to 'babble' with their hands.

To measure the gestures of their tiny subjects with precision, Petitto's group used optical sensors that tracked the trajectories of light-emitting diodes placed on the babies' hands. In this way, they studied three children of deaf parents and three children of hearing parents. The babies, who were all deemed to be at the same level of development, came in for examinations at six, ten and 12 months old. The researchers discovered that hearing babies exposed to sign language displayed two distinct patterns of hand movements, only one of which they shared with the other children.

Indeed, the infants of signing parents exclusively produced low-frequency hand motions. The other babies only made high-frequency gestures. Also, the sign-exposed babies made the low-frequency motions within a restricted space in front of their bodies¿an area that corresponded with the space in which signs are made. "This dramatic distinction between the two types of hand movements indicates that babies find it important and can make use of the rhythmic patterns underlying human language," Petitto says. Next they plan to explore the sing-song rhythms parents use to communicate with their infants.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe