Heat Waves Are Causing Mass Fish Deaths in Australia

Drought conditions and poor water management have contributed to the events

Murray-Darling Basin.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Hundreds of thousands of native fish in Australia’s Darling River have died following a major outbreak of blue–green algae and some severe weather. Two mass die-offs have been reported near Menindee in western New South Wales—the first was late last year, and the second last week.

Outbreaks of blue–green algae (cyanobacteria), which thrive in warm water, are not uncommon during droughts. The algae did not directly cause the mass die-off; rapid cooling and intense rainfall might have disrupted the bloom and depleted the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water, killing the fish, said Anthony Townsend, a senior fisheries manager at the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, in a statement.

But low water levels in the river have compounded the die-offs, which have greatly affected native species such as bony herring (Nematalosa erebi), golden and silver perch (Macquaria ambigua and Bidyanus bidyanus, respectively) and the vulnerable Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) . “Unfortunately, the main causes of this distressing event are the lack of water flowing into the northern rivers, and the impact of 100 years of over-allocation of precious water resources throughout the entire basin,” says the Murray–Darling Basin Authority, a statutory agency that oversees the basin through which the river flows.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Basin plan

The basin supports around 40% of Australia’s agricultural production by value, with much of the water going to dairy farming, cotton and rice. But removing water for agriculture has caused major environmental problems, including increased salinity and reduced river flows, and the system is now under threat.

In 2012, state and national governments agreed on an Aus$13-billion (US$9.4-billion) plan to reallocate 3.2 trillion litres of water to the environment, through a mix of buying back water allocations from farmers and installing water-efficiency infrastructure, by 2024.

But an independent assessment of the basin plan in 2017 concluded that its progress had stalled and was at risk of failing, in part because the national government had reduced the amount of water that could be bought and returned to environmental flows. Sarah Hanson-Young, a member of the Australian Greens party, says this has contributed to the current low water flows, and has urged the government to return more water to the environment.

Bill Shorten, the leader of the country’s opposition Labor party, has called for the government to establish an emergency scientific taskforce to investigate the die-offs.

Agencies have warned that further die-offs are likely over the next few months, with heatwaves forecast across south-eastern Australia this week and dry conditions set to continue.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on January 15, 2019.

Bianca Nogrady is a freelance science journalist based in Sydney, Australia.

More by Bianca Nogrady

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe