Hidden Holograms Help ID Digital Image Tampering

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Investigators can utilize a variety of tools to determine whether currency or historical documents are counterfeit. But figuring out whether a digital image has been tampered with can be more difficult, because the product is less tangible. Now scientists have developed a technique based on holograms that they say will help curb digital fraud.

The approach relies on an invisible watermark that is embedded into a digital file. Giuseppe Schirripa Spagnolo from the University of Roma Tre in Rome and his colleagues developed a system in which an image such as a company logo is first transformed into a computer generated hologram (CGH). A CGH is based on the light patterns made by a true hologram and a watermark manufactured in this way can be reconstructed in its entirety from only a fraction of the data. The researchers then encrypt the CGH data and add it to a digital image as a replacement to random, high frequency "noise" that doesn't affect image quality and is invisible to the human eye. Recipients of the digital image who know the key to the encryption can later reconstruct the watermark to ascertain whether the image has been tampered with.

In the images above, the original picture (top) was modified to change the colors of two cats (middle). After dividing the image into 16 quadrants, the researchers reconstructed the watermarks and determined which three quadrants (marked in yellow) had been corrupted. "We hope that this technique can be used to improve the reliability of photographs in the media" says co-author Lorenzo Cozzella. "Digital cameras could be developed so that an invisible watermark is added when a picture is taken. A newspaper buying a photo from a freelancer could then check for a watermark to confirm that it hasn't been tampered with to make it more newsworthy." The results appear in the latest issue of the Journal of Optics A.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe