High IQs May Help Thwart Post-Traumatic Stress

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Those who have had a hard life may not be truly hardened to its most traumatic moments. A new study of more than 700 children born in the mid-1980s finds that those with higher IQs were less likely to have been exposed to traumatic events in their youth and therefore less likely to have experienced post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Meanwhile, children who exhibited anxiety or poor conduct at young ages and those who grew up in inner cities were both more likely to encounter trauma and suffer from PTSD.

PTSD typically occurs in the wake of a traumatic event--anything from illness to an earthquake to witnessing a shooting--and its symptoms are anxiety, depression, sleep disorders and flashbacks. Naomi Breslau, an epidemiologist at Michigan State University and the lead author of the study published in the November issue of Archives of General Psychiatry, says that when researchers first encountered the connection between intelligence and PTSD, while studying Vietnam veterans, "the idea was that it was the PTSD that caused a reduction in IQ." Subsequent studies, including her team's, however, showed that to be untrue: "It wasn't low IQ, but it was high IQ that came up as an important factor," she explains. "High IQ is protective, rather than lower IQ is a risk factor."

In the new study, Breslau's team studied 336 boys and 377 girls born in one of two hospitals: one located in a suburban area and another in an impoverished urban neighborhood, where traumatic events are more likely to occur. At six years of age, each child took a standard IQ test that resulted in a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. In addition, the children's teachers evaluated them on their conduct at school, while the researchers interviewed parents to ascertain whether the kids showed any signs of anxiety-related behavior, such as irrational fears. When the children reached 17 years of age, Breslau's team probed each subject to determine what, if any, trauma they had suffered over the previous 11 years as well as what effects it may have had on them.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Of the 713 study participants, nearly 76 percent had suffered through at least one traumatic event, and more than 8 percent of those subjects presented symptoms of PTSD. Those teens who were found to have had behavioral issues as children were nearly three times more likely to have experienced trauma and twice as likely to have PTSD than those who exhibited good conduct. Urban children were more than three times more likely than their suburban counterparts to experience trauma and nearly twice as likely to suffer from PTSD. However, those with an IQ higher than 115--one standard deviation above the mean--were only 30 percent as likely to have faced a traumatic event and were only 20 percent as likely to have PTSD. In fact, this protective aspect of IQ to trauma and PTSD was consistent even if a child grew up in an urban area or had behavioral issues.

High IQ is a solid predictor of education-related abilities as well as socioeconomic success, says Breslau, who speculates that higher intelligence may also confer the ability to avoid "getting into trouble." The low incidence of PTSD among more intelligent kids, she adds, could be tied to advanced coping with any sort of exposure to severe occurrences. It is "the way that people explain to themselves what happened to them, how it fits in with their lives, whether it is their fault or not their fault, whether they can get over it and perform some task," Breslau says. "There is no question that there are cognitive aspects with the disorder."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe