New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Higher IQ May Help Protect Soldiers from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Military troops currently deployed in Operation Enduring Freedom face explicit dangers on the battlefield. But they may face a more insidious danger¿in the form of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)¿in the years to come. Characterized by flashbacks or nightmares that replay the traumatic events, an avoidance of reminders of the ordeal or a hyperalert state, PTSD was first diagnosed as shell-shock after World War I. Now new research, published in the current issue of the journal Neuropsychology, suggests that higher IQ may help shield soldiers from PTSD.

Jennifer Vasterling of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in New Orleans and colleagues studied 47 Vietnam veterans, 26 of whom suffer from PTSD. Though the extent of combat that the soldiers experienced proved the most important predictor of PTSD severity, the researchers found that veterans with higher pre-combat IQs were significantly less likely to have the disorder. Moreover, among veterans that developed PTSD, those with greater intellectual resources displayed less severe symptoms. The researchers note that actual premilitary measures of intellectual functioning are not readily available. They thus administered tests aimed at assessing the veterans' general information and word knowledge to estimate their IQs prior to serving in the military. Greater verbal skills, the authors suggest, could help soldiers better discuss their experiences in order to make sense of them and could help them establish more extensive networks for social support.

PTSD veterans also performed less proficiently on tasks requiring sustained attention, working memory and registration of new verbal information than did veterans without the disorder, according to the study. These findings resemble those reported for Gulf War veterans, suggesting that the cognitive problems suffered by veterans may be similar, even if their war experiences are not. Though the PTSD-related difficulties are mild compared to those posed by other neurological disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Vasterling says, they "do trouble the veterans, who state that they interfere with daily life¿especially their poor concentration."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe