Higher Temperatures Lessen Plants' Ability to Store CO2

A new study based on NASA satellite data and meteorological data shows that the amount of carbon absorbed by Earth's plants and trees fell in the past decade

By Lauren Morello & ClimateWire

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Rising temperatures have helped blunt plants' ability to pull carbon from the atmosphere, according to a study published yesterday in Science.

The amount of carbon soaked up by Earth's plants and trees fell by roughly 1 percent, or 550 million metric tons, between 2000 and 2009.

Researchers at the University of Montana say that global warming, large-scale droughts and an overall drying trend in the Southern Hemisphere contributed to the drop.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Warmer temperatures did lengthen growing seasons in high northern regions, but that wasn't enough to counteract the effect of changes in Earth's water cycle.

The scientists based their findings on information gathered by a NASA satellite as well as meteorological data.

Authors Maosheng Zhao and Steven Running, both ecologists, were surprised by their results, Zhao said.

That's largely because Running contributed to a study published in 2003 that found the amount of carbon taken up by plants increased between 1982 and 1999, a time period during which temperatures rose and the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere grew.

A 'gloomy' future?
"We expected that net primary productivity would increase," Zhao said. "However, after we analyzed our data from 2002 to 2009, we found instead of increasing, NPP showed a reduced trend."

Zhao added, "It's this drought and drying that caused the decrease."

Overall, plants and trees absorb about half of CO2 emissions produced by burning fossil fuels. The world's oceans take up the rest.

But the new study suggests that might be changing, with consequences for global food security and biofuel production.

"We don't know what will happen in the future," Zhao said. "But many models estimate that in the future, droughts will become more frequent. So based on that, we expect the future will be gloomy."

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American