Homo Sapiens Fingered in Neandertal Cold Case

A forensic analysis suggests that the weapon wielded in a stabbing attack came from modern humans

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An injury sustained by a Neandertal who died 50,000 years ago has puzzled scientists for nearly half a century. The individual, found at the site of Shanidar in Iraq and known as Shanidar 3, has a deep slice in one of the ribs, indicating that he was stabbed with a stone implement. The question has been: by whom? There are several possibilities: Either a fellow Neandertal or an early modern human did it intentionally, or the hapless victim himself or a hunting partner inflicted the wound by accident.

Researchers now think they have the answer. In a paper released online last week by the Journal of Human Evolution, Neandertal expert Steven Churchill of Duke University and his colleagues describe experiments in which they took replicas of stone points made by Neandertals and early moderns who lived in western Asia and wielded them against pig carcasses, which stood in for Neandertals. The investigators attached the points to wooden shafts and launched them with a calibrated crossbow that enabled them to deliver both high and low kinetic energy stabs to the carcasses' ribs.

Churchill and his colleagues found that the marks left on the ribs by the low-energy stabs, which were intended to simulate the blows delivered by the projectile weapons early modern humans' used, more often resembled the puncture evident on Shanidar 3's rib than did the marks that resulted from the high-energy stabs, which simulated the blows delivered by the handheld spears Neandertals brandished.

The team thus concluded that the culprit in the Shanidar 3 case was most likely a modern human. But other experts are not so sure. Paleoanthropologist John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin–Madison wrote in his blog that the findings are not sufficient to exclude the possibility that a Neandertal-made weapon created the wound.

But even if a modern human did fire a dart at Shanidar 3, that does not mean moderns drove the Neandertals to extinction in this way, as Churchill stressed in a statement. Although scholars once thought that modern humans might have killed off the Neandertals, studies conducted over the past decade suggest that climate or subtle differences in behavior or biology between the two human groups are to blame.

For more on the demise of the Neandertals, see the "The Mysterious Downfall of the Neandertals" in the August issue of Scientific American.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe