Hope for an Alzheimer's Vaccine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: P. ST. GEORGE-HYSLOP

As Alzheimer's disease progresses, so-called amyloid plaques build up in the brain and the nerve cells are destroyed. The diseased organ slowly wastes away (see image), leading to memory loss and other cognitive disabilities. Although there are competing theories about what causes this devastating damage, many scientists have placed the blame on an accumulation of amyloid beta peptides. A new report in today's issue of Nature helps prove that idea. Moreover, Peter St. George-Hyslop, director of the Center for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases at the University of Toronto, and his colleagues report that vaccinations of the peptides may in fact serve to prevent and treat Alzheimer's.

The scientists developed transgenic mice having amyloid plaques in their brain tissue and cognitive impairments like those seen in people with Alzheimer's disease. Earlier studies showed that immunizing such animals with amyloid beta peptides could remove amyloid plaques. But in this round of experimentation, the scientists further demonstrated that the injections could actually block the production of the plaques and forestall learning difficulties. "Not only were we able to clean up the brain tissue, but we also prevented the behavioral consequences of Alzheimer's," St. George-Hyslop says. "Obviously it is more important that a treatment or prevention in humans be able to block the clinical dementia." The scientists say that the amyloid beta plaque vaccination is ready for human testing.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe